The Conversation Stops Here

By | November 23, 2011

This is a salutory reminder that, for all the talk these days of companies engaging the public and media in a conversation instead of just pumping out ads and slogans, not everyone is following suit. Here’s what I just received from a product manager at a regional Asian office for one of Japan’s biggest companies after I had requested a phone or email interview with the Japanese designers or product managers of a new device:

I did a quick check with our HQ in Japan and due to our company policy, we cannot arrange for such a phone interview or provide [you] with any unpublished materials or information to the media. Basically, we do not correspond with [any] news reporter/writer via phone or email without his presence. Also, approval from company’s management is need for any correspondence with the media.

I’m not going to give the name of the company because I don’t want to get the person in trouble; they were only trying to help by passing on my request to his bosses. But if you’ve ever wondered why we don’t always do such a good job of covering some companies products, you might spare a thought for the difficulties in actually reaching them with the most innocuous of queries. Shame is the product is a really good one.

Another Curse of LOOSE wire

By | November 23, 2011

Apologies for the tardiness here, but another case of the Blessing of Loose Wire, as Writely, a web-app editing application I liked and have written abouti, s acquired by Google. So much so, I’m beginning to think of my, and others’ praise, as a curse. Can this be good for the evolution of software?

Yes, apparently. According to the Writely Blog: there are good reasons why this is a good thing (with my sarcastic comments in italics):

Here are our “top 10” reasons why being part of Google is fantastic for Writely and the Writely team:
10. Writely is like a caterpillar that we hope to make into a beautiful butterfly at Google! or a bug left forgotten in a bottom drawer…
9. We love Google’s philosophy and values — especially “Focus on the user.”  who doesn’t? Focus on the user, I mean?
8. We’re as passionate as Google is about respecting users’ privacy. Who isn’t?
7. Many of our users are already Google fans using other Google services. Who doesn’t?
6. Being at Google will help us do more great things faster. Speed isn’t everything.
5. Some people didn’t feel comfortable trusting a tiny startup with their documents…and we’re no longer a tiny startup. Some people trust smaller startups than big fellas with lots of cross-cutting agendas.
4. We like lava lamps and they’re pretty much standard decor at Google. Hey, I’ll give you mine.
3. Three words: Free Googleplex lunches 😉 Much overrated. What’s wrong with a Big Mac?
2. As fun as it’s been to launch a popular, global, 24×7 Web service, it’ll be nice to take a vacation once in a while! Fair enough. Let’s go to Bali.
…and the number one reason???
1. We’ll be able to bring Writely to not just thousands but millions of users — the more, the merrier 🙂 Good luck with that. You’ve done great so far. 

I’m ambivalent about these guys getting snapped up. This is the umpteenth startup I love that’s gotten swallowed up. I don’t begrudge the guys their windfall, and I don’t question their continued committment. But we end users have learned to be a bit suspicious of anything big, and I guess we kinda love to root for the little guy. It’s hard to love the little guy when he emerges from under the trenchcoat of some big bruiser, however disarming the smile on his face. 

The little guy is gone. Long live the next little guy to come along.

technorati tags: , , ,

How to Pitch A Journalist: Get Their Name Wrong

By | November 23, 2011

I once had this editor who would write the occasional feature. They weren’t that great, but when they hit the wire — as we journos would call the process whereby a story would be added to the wire service queue, appearing either on customers’ computer screens or on those long-gone ticker printers — they would always seem to have some small, innocuous error in them. At first we thought this was just bad writing, or editing, or something, but then one of us wondered: Were the errors deliberately inserted? When the correction ran, as it would always have to do however minor the error, the whole story would have to appear again on the wire, meaning that it went out to subscribers twice. That effectively doubled the chance of clients picking up the story and using it in their newspaper. Was the journalist being careless, or being smart?

This occurred to me today when I got another email pitch from a PR company beginning “Dear Julian…” As some of you may know, I’m not called Julian and haven’t been for some time. Part of me fumes that someone trying to get my attention can’t even bother to get my name right, but then, I’ve probably done it a few times myself so I can’t get too upset. I fired off an email pointing out the error and also tried to make it not sound like I was too demoralised by the fact that I was still so obscure this person hadn’t heard of me before.

But then I started to think of my old editor, and wonder whether it wasn’t part of some deliberate plan to engage me in a dialog I never would have gotten into had the erroneous name-calling not happened. By writing back I was now in a conversation with them. Which is presumably better than no conversation at all. Indeed the person concerned quickly replied with some suitably self-effacing and apologetic comment and, incidentally, a fresh sideways pitch. And of course now we’re best buddies so I can’t really ever ignore them again. Every pitch they send I’ll have to reply to, especially if they start calling me Jermaine. Could I have just fallen for the smartest pitch ever?

technorati tags: ,

If Your Computer Won’t Acknowledge Your iPod

By | November 23, 2011

For anyone who can’t get their computer to recognise an iPod plugged into a USB port, the likeliest solution is to reset the iPod. This won’t remove any files from the iPod, though some settings may be lost. Here from the Apple website is how to do it, although the title, Resetting iPod if it appears frozen or doesn’t respond, is misleading as your iPod may actually be working fine. Anyway:

    • Toggle the Hold switch on and off. (Slide it to Hold, then turn it off again.)
    • Press and hold the Menu and Select buttons until the Apple logo appears, about 6 to 10 seconds. You may need to repeat this step.

That should do it.