News: XP Has Made Everything Better. No, Really

By | November 24, 2011
 From the I Must Be Living in a Parallel Universe Dept,  I read with interest of PC Magazine announcement today that it has issued its “Annual Report Card on Service & Reliability Of Major Technology Companies” in which it says that ”consumers are more satisfied with the computer products and peripherals they’re using and the companies behind them this year than in 2002″. That seems unlikely, based on my experience and mailbag, but I did splutter some serious coffee when I read lower down their press release that “Overall, service and reliability has improved, due in large part to the effect of Microsoft Corp.’s Windows XP”. The release went on to say that ”Windows XP has brought computer users the stability of Microsoft’s corporate operating systems – Windows NT and 2000.” Editor in chief of the magazine, Michael Miller, is quoted as saying: “If an OS performs better, so does the hardware it controls.”
 
 
Well, yes, that’s true. But why do I keep having to reboot my XP preloaded notebook because it goes slower than my grandpa’s Vespa? And why do some minimized programs just flash away when I try to switch programs, as if it’s a Dirty Old Man’s convention? And why does the computer spontaneously reboot of its own accord, usually on Monday afternoons or when there’s a half moon? I may be in a minority around here, but my impression with XP is that it’s somewhat better than Windows 98, but it still gives me the shivers. The idea that somehow things are much, much better is just silly.

News: Bothered By Mosquitoes? Use Your Cellphone

By | November 24, 2011
 From the Why Use Bugspray When You Can Use Your Cellphone Dept, a report from the Korea Times on a new service by SK Telecom. Its seems South Korea’s top mobile operator is offering downloadable ring tones which, er, generate anti-mosquito sound waves that deter mosquitoes within a range of one metre.
 
 
The mosquito repelling service uses a particular spectrum of sound waves, which are undetectable by human ears. But the frequencies annoy mosquitoes, SK Telecom said. And presumably you, when you get the bill, at 3,000 won a download. One of the other downsides pointed out by the correspondent is that “the service takes up more battery power, but customers can effectively use the service with rechargeable equipment.” Or you could just throw your cellphone at the mosquitoes when the battery runs out.
 
Who said technology isn’t making our lives easier?

News: The Spam Top Ten

By | November 24, 2011
  From the We Already Knew That But It’s Still Interesting Dept,  FrontBridge Technologies Inc, which calls itself “a trusted provider of email protection and secure
messaging services” (as opposed, presumably, to those Distrusted Providers of Email Protection, or the Somewhat Trusted Except When They’ve Had A Beer Or Two Providers of Email Protection) have, after evaluating hundreds of millions of messages (no really, they say this, I’m not making it up), “today revealed the top ten deceptive subject lines that spammers use to entice their target recipients into opening spam emails”.
 
This, of course, is all an effort to promote something called the FrontBridge TrueProtect(TM) Spam Analyzer, which “filters and analyzes message characteristics for more than 1,200 enterprise email domains” but sounds much more like something out of Monty Python and the Holy Email or an old Woody Allen flick. Anyway, in case you’re still interested, FrontBridge’s spam analysts “assessed deceptive subject lines in spam received by the company’s large base of business customers, and then ranked the subject lines based on frequency”. Here’s what they found (they even tell you the deception strategy, just in case you’ve had a lunchtime beer or two yourself and couldn’t figure out the spammers’ devilish ways on your own):
 
The Top 10 Trickiest Spammer Subject Lines:
 
Subject Line:                                    Deception Strategy:
 
1. RE: Information you asked for           1. Implies you’ve requested something
2. hey                                               2. Most common friendly intro
3. Check this out!                               3. Common intro to friendly forward
4. Is this your email?                           4. Poses as old friend or colleague
5. Please resend the email                   5. Implies you’ve sent an email first
6. RE: Your order                               6. Implies you’ve bought something
7. Past due account                           7. Worries recipient re: financial debt
8. Please verify your                           8. Implies a sign-up or order placed information
9. Version update                              9. Fake software update via email
10. RE: 4th of July                           10. Guesses at holiday plans
 
So now you know. Actually, buried in all this glaring obviousness is an interesting point. The use of these kind of tactics has increased, FrontBridge say, more than 50% in the first six months of the year. That’s quite a trend.
 
The moral of the tale? If you send someone an email, try to think of a subject header that doesn’t sound like it could be this new kind of spam. Oh, and pity the FrontBridge spam analysts having to trawl through all this dross to compile their top ten. Let’s hope they aren’t planning to update it every week.
 
 
 
 

 

News: Big Brother’s Net

By | November 24, 2011
 For those of you interested in how the Internet is not an unrestricted place for everyone, Reporters Sans Frontieres/Reporters Without Borders last month published their second annual report on censorship in cyberspace, “The Internet under Surveillance – Obstacles to the free flow of information online” which details “attitudes to the Internet by the powerful in 60 countries, between spring 2001 and spring 2003”.
 
 
The report looks at quite a few countries, although it leaves some obvious ones out: It looks at Australia, for example, but leaves out Indonesia and Brunei. Looking at China, for example: “Population : 1,284,972,000; Internet users : 59,100,000; Privately-owned ISPs : no; Internet Users and cyber-dissidents in prison : 42. The number of Internet users doubles nearly every six months and the number of websites every year. But this dizzying growth is matched by the authorities’ energetic attempts to monitor, censor and repress Internet activity, with tough laws, jailing cyber-dissidents, blocking access to websites, monitoring online forums and shutting down cybercafes.”
 
Download the full report as a PDF file here (2.5 MB).

News: Another Thai crackdown

By | November 24, 2011
 
  After terrorists and drug dealers, Thailand is launching another crackdown, this time on online gamers. According to a report by the BBC, Thailand will impose a night curfew on online gaming, because of concerns about rising addiction rates among young players. The curfew will block game servers between 2200 and 0600 daily from 15 July, on the instructions of technology minister Surapong Suebwonglee. Particularly popular is the Korean game Ragnarok.
 
Needless to say, Khun Surapong has become the object of scorn in Thailand’s chatrooms.