The Rise and Fall of Blogging, Twitter and Facebook

A lot of people ask me whether they should blog. Usually I give them the stock answer: blog because you’ve got something to say, because you feel you’ve got to write, and because you want to connect to other people on the same subject. But now I think I’d add another suggestion: don’t bother.

Here, in a nutshell is a history of blogging: a few years back someone invented the idea of software that would make it really easy to add text and links to a website. It could also add them atop the existing material, so the fresh, new stuff was on top, not the bottom. Blogging was born.

Geeks were of course the first bloggers, and while political blogging is now hugely influential, it’s geeks who have led the pack, adding innovations like voice, video, and mobile blogging (where you can blog from lots of different devices, like phones.) Geeks define the way blogging is going outside political blogging, for the simple reason that geek blogging tends to branch out into other subjects, whereas political blogging is mainly political (more like pamphleteering, I’d say.)

Which is why blogging is now changing. In the past year it’s started to morph into something else. There’s been a rise in something called microblogging (sometimes called tumblelogs), where services allow you and me to post and share little snippets of information about ourselves, whether it’s what we’re doing, thinking, reading or listening to, where we are or who we’re talking to. The best known of these is Twitter, but there are others: Jaiku, Pownce, for example.

These microblogs may not look much like blogs – they’re just streams of 150-character consciousness, from the mundane to the slightly less mundane, to which other users subscribe — but for a lot of people they perform the same function: link them into a broader social network where they can both broadcast their doings and find out what others are doing too. As we in Asia found with SMS, North America has found that an enforced limit on the number of letters you can use in a message is a blessing, not a curse.

Twitter et al have not been for everybody. But as with most technology, its usage has evolved into a new medium. Technology rarely replaces another in direct succession, but creates a new category of its own, as users make it their own (or reject it.) Old technologies might fall by the wayside, but rarely because another technology replaced it overnight.)

So with Twitter. Twitter did lots of things, but probably its most lasting impact was to push blogging away from writing and more into connecting. Most people read blogs because they wanted to feel connected to other people by reading what they were thinking. But it’s time consuming, and as blogs proliferated, and as blog posts tended to get longer, readers had less and less time to read these things. Twitter made a perfect alternative: a palatable buffet of updates, without the indigestion that comes from having to read blogs.

The next step in this process (and all this is happening within the space of a few months) has been the rise of Facebook. Facebook started out as U.S. college yearbook type application in 2005, but last year opened up to all users of he Internet. In the past couple of months I’ve noticed a big jump in the number of new users, at least in my little neck of the woods.

What’s interesting about this is that Facebook, among many of its features, focuses again on what I would pompously call the “networked awareness” aspect of blogging and twittering. The most important part of Facebook is becoming someone else’s friend, which then allows you to see what the other person is saying (whether in their blog, or in a one line ‘status message’ on their homepage.) There’s nothing new about this — the music-oriented MySpace does it, the business-oriented LinkedIn does it – but Facebook revolves around the something we all have in common: a past.

In other words, we build our Facebook address book around people we used to work with, people we went to school with, people who are already in our other address books. Enter your previous jobs and schools and you can easily find familiar faces and names, and add them to your buddy list. As I’m sure you have found, it’s much easier to connect with someone you already know than someone you don’t.

Not that Facebook is a sort of gallery of the past — it also allows you to connect to people via shared interests, or shared friends, or people you worked with but didn’t know at the time. All of the communication involved in this can be done publicly or privately, and can be done individually or as part of a group. Facebook occupies a middle ground between MySpace and LinkedIn because it’s restrained in design (something that could not be said for most MySpace pages) and because it’s not too businessy, which is what LinkedIn is all about.

So Facebook finds itself sharing part of a wave with Twitter, which in turn shared part of a wave with blogging. In a year we’ve found ourselves moving on from simply blogging to make ourselves heard, to building Facebook pages to reach out to those we’d like to connect to more closely. I’m not a huge fan of Facebook but it does connect me to way more interesting people (and long lost friends) than blogging ever did.

So is blogging dead? Some bloggers like Shel Israel, who co-wrote blogging’s defining book “Naked Conversations“ have noticed a fall in readers in recent months, and his comments have quickly led to another blogging “meme” (an idea that spreads, which is what blogging does well). The truth is that more people are blogging, more people competing for attention (leading to a terrible rise in Shameless Self Promotion, where instead of commenting on other posts in the space provided, a lot of folk simply try to point readers to their own sites.) Blogging long ago reached critical mass: Now it’s reached saturation point, and something has to (to mix a metaphor) give.

So expect things to evolve further. I’m not saying there aren’t some great blogs out there — blogs aren’t just about social networks, they’re also about great writing, and about information, both of which blogs also do very well. But blogs will continue to branch off into new areas as our needs, and the devices we use, evolve.

Blogging in short, never dies: It’s just the start of a road that goes we know not where. So if you’re thinking of blogging, ask yourself why you want to do it, and whether you might not be better off twittering, powncing, jaikuing or facebooking. Or waiting until the next Big Thing. It shouldn’t be long.

6 thoughts on “The Rise and Fall of Blogging, Twitter and Facebook

  1. Thought provoking post.

    In my view, there are three types of blogs/bloggers:

    1) Those who provide insight, opinion and commentary. This is much akin to the “columnist” in a magazine or newspaper, or a feature segment reporter for radio or TV.

    2) The news reporter. This is more of a here are the facts you need to know. Readers of these blogs want the “news” and awareness of what’s occurring from people whose views they trust.

    3) The personal blogger. This is the blogger who shares their life with the world. Much like “dear diary” this kind of blog attracts people who either know the author or people who are attracted to the author’s wit and commentary about how they are affected by things or how they are living their life.

    The bloggers and blogs which blend the above three tend to be the most fun to read, but are even more fun to author.

  2. Pingback: WASTE P2P
  3. So Jeremy, I’m trying to develop a concept that plays really well with your post. Let me explain it and I’d love a little feedback:

    What I’m seeing with Twitter, IM, email, blogging, etc, etc is something I’m calling “Ambiance Scatter” — kinda taking Leisa Reichelt’s concept of “Ambient Intimacy” and wondering how its different levels intimacy find the most appropriate medium for broadcast.

    What I noticed is that with the advent of Twitter, a B-list tech blogger friend of mine — a great writer — stopped blogging about personal, uninteresting to the wider-audience stuff on his blog, and instead left the “I love salad at Joe’s cafe” stuff for Twitter posts.

    So while there’s a part of me that’s dismayed about the quality of writing overall, I think we are benefiting from the fact that the more thoughtful communicators out there have new means, and more appropriate means, to communicate their array of messages.

  4. Nate, thanks for this, and I definitely think you’re on to something. I think all these different channels serve different purposes although there is a paradox as well. None will survive if they don’t open themselves up to allow others services to access them (so posting to Twitter will also appear on Jaiku, for instance.) On the other hand, this may flatten the messages again by making poster not differentiate between the audience and the nature of the message they’re posting. Probably the best outcome we can hope for are services that aggregate not the resulting messages but the posting, so ‘thoughtful communicators’ can more easily post the right message for the right medium.

  5. Thought provoking. Any technology takes time to mature, and I think blogging is still maturing. Technologies that last, such as the technology that we know as a credit card took 10 years before mainstream people felt comfortable using it. I think it will be another 3 to 5 years before we see what blogging will really become. Other things will evolve from blogging to be sure, but blogging will mature soon.

Comments are closed.