Vista: Preloaded With Gunk
|
« Is Old Media Killing Itself by Blogging? | Main | Twitter: SMS for Those Who Missed the SMS Revolution »
|
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5af153ef00d834fa16d453ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Vista: Preloaded With Gunk:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
totally agree with him!
Posted by: John Orford | April 07, 2007 at 02:36 AM
From the sounds of you and your associate, the problem may be the OOBE/OEM crap that comes with Vista.
I've installed Vista (three different versions, Business, Enterprise, and Ultimate) on over a dozen machines. A few upgraded WinXP or Win2k, others were fresh installs, and a few were installations on machines I built.
The OEM garbage, with all the "free" crapola they install, such as MusicBox or whatever it is called, along with Real Player and all the other spyware and trialware sucks.
Get yourself a real version, not an OEM version, and see the differences.
Posted by: Dave J. (Scoop0901) | April 07, 2007 at 05:21 AM
Dave J.,
Yeh, but the point is that about 99%+ of people will use the OEM version.
Posted by: John Orford | April 08, 2007 at 12:07 AM
The OEM versions 'cost' less because they're subsidized by all the crap. A clean install is much more expensive. I guess the solution is to do a clean install with the Vista that comes on the OEM machines, but I'm also guessing that's not possible. What has surprised me, however, is how non-OEM Vista doesn't work particularly well on a clean machine -- crashes, drivers that don't work (even on a machine 'designed for Vista', as well as programs that just won't run on Vista.
Posted by: Jeremy Wagstaff | April 08, 2007 at 12:29 AM
Craplet is a great name. We'll call the craplets that phone home ET craplets (RealPlayer, etc.).
If Photoshop and iTunes were available for Linux I would have already ditched Windows long ago. I would try Gimp, but I have been using Photoshop too long to learn a new set of commands.
I'm not quite ready for a Mac... but it is tempting.
Posted by: Emery Jeffreys | April 08, 2007 at 05:27 AM
"If Photoshop and iTunes were available for Linux I would have already ditched Windows long ago."
You can run both (well PS7 at least) well under Linux. Try CrossOver or Parallels for Linux.
My worry is that Linux will go the way of Vista, once Dell starts preloading it :)
"What has surprised me, however, is how non-OEM Vista doesn't work particularly well on a clean machine"
Jeremy, I'd really love to hear some thoughts on what you think of the new Ubuntu when it comes out (April 19th), perhaps on tenminut.es? It comes by default on a live CD so you should get it up and running in no time.
Posted by: John Orford | April 08, 2007 at 06:55 PM