Microsoft’s IE About Turn

Microsoft, apparently reacting to the rise of Firefox and criticism over security, has reversed engine and said the next Internet Explorer update would come before the next version of Windows, according to CNET:

Reversing a longstanding Microsoft policy, Bill Gates said Tuesday that the company will ship an update to its browser separately from the next version of Windows.

A beta, or test, version of Internet Explorer 7 will debut this summer, Microsoft’s chairman and chief software architect said in a keynote address at the RSA Conference 2005 here. The company had said that it would not ship a new IE version before the next major update to Windows, code-named Longhorn, arrives next year.

More on the official IEBlog.

Of course, it’s not just about security. CNET points to complaints about the fact the last version was only available to those who already had XP or had paid for an operating system upgrade, while others have complained about IE’s lack of adherence to web standards such as CSS, PNG, XHTML and XML. To that I’d the tendency to develop pages, either on the Net or within Office, that can only be viewed with IE.

As one poster to the (rather pompous and PR-spun) blog posting announcing the upgrade put it:

But how long do you have to hear people scream and scream and scream that they need and want an updated IE? You play it as if you guys are doing your customers a favor! Get real! You’re only doing it because [Firefox] is gaining popularity.

Stick to standards and don’t add any MS proprietary bs to it and I’m sure you’ll win back a lot of the fans you’ve lost.

(For a glimpse of the legitimate concerns, as well as the rather, er, strong emotions elicited by the topic of browsers, the dozens of comments that follow the blog posting are worth a read. Reading them you can’t help feeling a bit sorry for the IE developers who post to the blog; it must be demoralizing to get as many flames as compliments. And I wonder how many more were deleted for language. )

And while we’re on the subject, what I’d like to see next are companies — particularly those in banking and public databases — ensure their sites are compatible with non-IE browsers. It’s shoddy, lazy, and poor business practice to exclude users based on what browser they’re using. Perhaps we should be building a directory of those websites that don’t support all W3C–compliant browsers?

16. February 2005 by jeremy
Categories: Software, apps | Tags: , , , , , , , | 2 comments

Comments (2)

  1. You touched on one of my biggest pet peeves ever – sites that are or claim to be “IE Only”. Sometimes acessing these pages can be as simple as bypassing their browser check, or sometimes their site is actually broken and won’t display at all. My gas company site is one like this – and a year and a half later they haven’t fixed the problem and it still doesn’t work.

    I email the webmaster and complain if it’s a site that’s actually important to me, but usually I just grumble and move on to another site.

  2. The main issue is for them to first LEARN to make standard compliant websites, and think they are an actor of those standards without which the web wouldn’t live, then they may put out a new browser. They just think too much they are leading a technology where they are in fact transgressing it and forcing their standards down everyone throat. I am a webmaster fed up to wait for IExplorer.exe to be standard compliant and fix 3 years old css1 bugs (position: fixed;), let alone css2. Sure mozilla/firefox has bugs but these guys are already implementing css3 ….
    Here check this:
    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.msn.com%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&verbose=1

    Please, please MS stick to standards and implement them.