Plaxo and Privacy — A Storm In A Teacup?

By | April 16, 2004

Plaxo, the besieged contact updating service, is pointing readers of its blog to an article that takes issue with the company’s critics.

The article, written by Jim Harper of, takes issue with privacy concerns, especially those aired by Australian academic Roger Clarke which I’ve tried to summarise in an earlier post. Jim’s language is quite robust, apparently a reaction to Roger’s own riposte to an earlier posting by Jim on RFID tags. Still, he makes an interesting point: Why all the fuss about handing over your contact data?

For just a moment, let me go into Clarke’s starting point a little further: the idea that contact information is sensitive. It’s not. In fact, contact information is created precisely for the purpose of sharing. People print contact information on cards and give it out. There are entire books – called “phone books” – designed to broadcast contact information far and wide. People put their contact information on letters and in e-mails. Contact information is about as private as the nose on your face.

So who is right? It’s true that contact information in itself is a more or less public commodity. I can decline to hand over my business card to someone I don’t like the look of, but once the card is handed over to anyone, I can no longer assume that information is secure. But my reading (and hey, I’m no expert) of Roger’s original piece is that there are two main outstanding problems:

  • It’s less about handing over one’s data about oneself, but about someone else handing over their data about you. The main objection people have about Plaxo is that, by uploading their address book to Plaxo’s servers, someone else is giving away information about you. As Roger points out: “Under the doctrine of privity, a contract creates rights and responsibilities for the parties to the contract, but for no-one else. Hence there are no rights whatsoever under the contract for the individuals to whom the data relates.”
  • The second issue is about the connections implied in such data — not just whether you’re in someone’s address book, and who else is there alongside you. If someone is arrested for fraud, does the fact that you’re in their address book make you a suspect? Roger writes: ”The threat involved in consolidations of address-books therefore has an important social dimension, and if it affects a person’s employability or career advancement, then an economic dimension as well.”

On the surface neither of these concerns may seem all that relevant. If you’re in a criminal’s address book/PDA/cellphone chances are you’re going to be interviewed by police, whether they got the information from Plaxo or from riffling through his dashboard glove compartment. And, in the first case, what’s the difference between someone storing your contact details in their PDA than online with Plaxo?

First off, I think Jim’s taking too much of an old world view of privacy. He writes that “there isn’t much difference between an online social network and the online or offline lists of club memberships, fraternities, churches, phone systems, magazine subscribers, buyers of goods, sellers of goods, transporters of goods, employees, employers: the list of lists goes on and on.” True, in terms of the nature of such data. But computers and the Internet make handling — and, potentially, mining — such lists much more efficient. In its first seven months Plaxo had more than a million members: Assume, each one has a contact list of 100 people. That’s 100 million names (lots of duplication, of course, but my figures are conservative.) Plaxo has promised not to do anything with this data, but Roger’s point is a fair one: Existing privacy laws don’t really deal with situations where users voluntarily surrender data about other people. So we’re already in new territory.

Internet users are already aware of this; just a year or so ago many of us wouldn’t have baulked at entering personal details into a website in return for access. Not any more. The Internet, once this great repository of information and a community of benign and helpful folk, has turned around and bit us on the collective behind. Spam is just the most visible aspect of it. We now see our lives visible online, so much so that prospective dates are ‘Googled’ to see whether their background is up to snuff. Privacy nowadays is not so much about keeping yourself to yourself, but in trying to reassert some sort of control over which specific data enters the public domain. A blogger is quite happy to spill their most intimate beans online, but that doesn’t mean they’re about to reveal their cellphone number to telemarketers, or become part of some large database that may end up being sold to a few years down the track. Personal contact data are, after medical and financial data, the most sensitive data one has.

Jim’s right to raise questions about the heat that Plaxo has been taking (and I readily confess some of the postings here have perhaps contributed to it, although I’ve tried to synthesize the arguments for and against, along with Plaxo’s responses). But it seems to me that if people feel uncomfortable with their data being held by a company that has not revealed how it is going to make its money (or even if it has) then their right to not have their data stored there must be respected, both in law and in the storers’ privacy policy.  

One thought on “Plaxo and Privacy — A Storm In A Teacup?

  1. Stacy Martin

    Thanks as always for your comments and discussion. I believe you touch on two central themes that I’d like to follow up on:

    – How is Plaxo going to make money?
    – Respecting the rights of individuals, both in law and in the storer’s Privacy Policy.

    How is Plaxo going to make money?
    As you know, Plaxo offers a line of contact management products to help you update your address book and connect with friends, family, and colleagues. Our business model is based on upselling premium features to our growing user base. We are already generating revenue from the sales of our first premium service, Plaxo VIP Support, and we expect to be cash-flow positive by the end of 2004.

    In the coming months, we’ll be releasing additional subscription-based features, including a Plaxo business edition. However, we will also maintain a free version of Plaxo, allowing us to raise brand awareness and continue to provide our service to current and future members.

    Here’s a glimpse of some features you can look forward to:
    1. An address book “cleaner” that scans your address book to find duplicates and errors.
    2. A meeting manager that enables users to schedule meetings with others online.
    3. Opt-in directories for alumni lists and other organizations that allow consenting users to access each other’s address books.

    – Respecting the rights of individuals
    We understand this issue remains a contentious one, and I feel it really comes down to the issue of Ownership vs. Privacy. We’ve tried to establish policies that respect the rights of everyone involved while adhering to the law. I recently wrote about this issue back in March on our own blog. Rather than repeat the article, I point you to our blog entry: Your Contact Information: Ownership vs. Privacy. I’d love to hear back comments and feedback on this issue.

    Stacy Martin
    Plaxo Privacy Officer
    smartin @t


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.